首页> 外文OA文献 >Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia
【2h】

Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia

机译:民主与参与?澳大利亚博文盆地煤炭开采行业的社会和经济影响评估以及社区参与

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A review of economic impact assessment (EcIA), social impact assessment (SIA), and community participation practice in the rapidly growing coal industry of Australia's Bowen Basin suggests significant shortcomings in scope and reporting with neither EcIA nor SIA giving adequate attention to the measurement and distribution of negative impacts. This review also demonstrates a tendency to separate community participation from the conduct of impact assessment, partly in response to a perceived need to engage in relationship building with impacted communities through the entire life of mining operations. However, this separation also has significant implications for the quality of impact assessment studies and is suggestive of an approach to engagement that is more focused on expectation and image management than on participation in decision-making.
机译:对澳大利亚Bowen盆地快速发展的煤炭行业中的经济影响评估(EcIA),社会影响评估(SIA)和社区参与实践的回顾表明,在范围和报告方面存在重大缺陷,EcIA和SIA均未对衡量和评估给予足够重视负面影响的分布。此次审查还显示出一种趋势,即将社区参与与影响评估分开进行,部分是出于对在采矿运营的整个生命周期中与受影响社区建立关系的认识。但是,这种分离对影响评估研究的质量也有重大影响,并且暗示着一种参与方法,该方法更侧重于期望和图像管理,而不是参与决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号